"My analysis of the performative aspects these roles is very much indebted to…Butler’s...gender performativity” this means literally nothing
-
@sarahjeong I am not trying to pick a fight, because I find his behavior icky, but what is the problem with him going on 80 dates?
@GlennF
1) the ridiculousness of this outcome being labeled as “hacking” OKCupid
2) HE GRADED THEM ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY WERE SLUTTY
-
-
@sarahjeong SARAH. I clearly have been working too hard. I did not see the slutty part in the Wired piece. -
@GlennF I may be jumping to conclusions on that one, but one of the things he marks women down as is “a Samantha” -
@GlennF and, if I give him the benefit of the doubt, I still think the whole thing with grading the women is gross -
@GlennF it’s just, you know, not as gross as if he’s not using “Samantha” in the most obvious pop culture way -
@sarahjeong So I dunno. It makes me go ICK, but he says he used honest answers & found someone who wants to marry him. -
@GlennF I agree with all this, but my conclusion is that I am incredulous, scornful, and also— Judith Butler? Seriously? -
@GlennF if you’re going to go into the intricacies of your gross process in a ridiculous article that lauds you as a genius, I WILL MOCK YOU -
@sarahjeong Are you talking about his Medium piece? - 4 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong Oh, shit, what!Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.