So I think Bitcoin is a radical, interesting, and useful innovation in theory. In practice it is kind of a mess.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Qualify "radical." Innovative, yes. Never-before-seen, yes. But does it really get to the root of anything?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@KevinCarson1@legind That's what worries me about Bitcoin: no more public schools, highway maintenance, public health service?5 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @kragen
@kragen@KevinCarson1@legind 1) hard to dismantle states; imo cryptocurrency unlikely to harm schools/roads more than the govt irl does1 réponse 2 Retweets 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@kragen@KevinCarson1@legind 2) it’s *possible* to organize a voluntaristic commons. and that opens another can of worms w/r/t debate, but3 réponses 3 Retweets 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@kragen@KevinCarson1@legind if your concern is that pragmatically, domestic public goods are under threat by cryptocurrency. I doubt it.1 réponse 1 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@kragen@KevinCarson1@legind all of those things are much more threatened by austerity than this stuff, which is pretty pie-in-the-sky4 réponses 1 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@kragen@KevinCarson1 I think it's good to play out the scenarios of cryptocurrency-based macromarkets though, if just for fun1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@legind @kragen @KevinCarson1 yes, and there’s important discussions to be had about feasibility of voluntaristic societies
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.