@schemaly @ma_franks @EndRevengePorn @CathyReisenwitz I do think 1A has a gendered slant (Brandenburg test). But I also don’t think 1A is +
-
@ma_franks@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz I don’t think all third party disclosers are paradigm bad actors, and I don’t think +
@ma_franks @schemaly @EndRevengePorn @CathyReisenwitz the male/female perp/victim duality is universally true, or a helpful framework.
-
-
@sarahjeong@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz Not sure who's using male/female duality, but why not treat RP same as other sex acts -
@sarahjeong@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz That is, if you don't have consent, don't do it? -
@ma_franks@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz here are some reasons, non-exhaustive: 1) people who share “regular" porn aren’t + -
@ma_franks@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz required to procure or verify consent; 2) how to differentiate revenge porn from + -
@ma_franks@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz all unauthorized visual disclosures; 3) limited to visual, or general sexualizations?; -
@ma_franks@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz 4) reputational harm as a sex act seems really, really odd -
@sarahjeong@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz (1 make disclosure "intentional" and "knowing" (2 not sure what you mean ... -
@sarahjeong@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz (3 sexually explicit images only (4 yes, but no less real for that.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.