@CathyReisenwitz @ma_franks @schemaly @sarahjeong @WiredOpinion That lose their jobs, their sense of safety, their willingness to live.
-
@schemaly@ma_franks@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz I think criminalizing the immediate discloser does not address the core harm +
@schemaly @ma_franks @EndRevengePorn @CathyReisenwitz criminalizing secondary disclosure is too overbroad. +
-
-
@schemaly@ma_franks@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz So I prefer legal remedies towards the harms effected, rather than deterrence, + -
@schemaly@ma_franks@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz because I don’t think deterrence can be achieved in a manner that is both effective + -
@sarahjeong@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz Just to whom? After disclosure, all remedies are at best damage control. -
@ma_franks@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz I don’t think all third party disclosers are paradigm bad actors, and I don’t think + -
@ma_franks@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz the male/female perp/victim duality is universally true, or a helpful framework. -
@sarahjeong@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz Not sure who's using male/female duality, but why not treat RP same as other sex acts -
@sarahjeong@schemaly@EndRevengePorn@CathyReisenwitz That is, if you don't have consent, don't do it? - 6 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.