Little weird to talk up how you’re not going to “censor" speech unless it’s illegal, when you’re already prohibiting protected speech.
Looks like @bitbucket is already moderating racist “hate speech” (not covered by 1A) but not bothered by misogyny.https://twitter.com/eevee/status/412747355394289665 …
-
-
-
Pretty sure that this interpretation more or less eviscerates the
@bitbucket EULA, because CDA 230. https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issue/8629/harassing-repository#comment-7380632 … -
Can’t complain about that end-result, but deeply annoyed by “this doesn’t fit into any of those categories” + “won’t act w/o a court order"
-
tl;dr men on the internet make up things about the First Amendment
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.