@sarahjeong filtering client-side may help address that, but doesn't improve things for the other activists (or activism generally, prob)
-
@xor yes and that's not illogical! +1 is simple and we're talking about crippling time-sensitive civic engagement hashtags.
@xor And then your next argument is "But then it will just get circumvented" --> Yes. Some spammers will. But if no detriment, then why not?
-
-
@xor Yes, some avenues have a clear detriment (like pay-per-tweet, pay-per-account). But those are ideas on the other side of the spectrum. -
@sarahjeong and of course the detriment is false positives. Like: excluding new users from hashtags, for example.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong no, I'm saying they probably already do it. But they should do it faster, I guess? Hire +1 more employee to do it fulltime?Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.