The criminal complaint doesn’t use the new CA revenge porn law (it doesn’t need it AND the law doesn’t apply).
CA AG Harris cracks down on revenge porn site with the tools she has: Identity Theft and Extortion. https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press_releases/Complaint_3.pdf …? (ht @natnicol)
-
-
-
This is what I wanted to get at in my WIRED piece. We have the tools. Criminalization is a terrible idea AND isn’t necessary.
-
@sarahjeong well, I dunno if these charges will stick. I suspect the CDA bars them on the ID theft. Not sure about extortion. -
@adamsteinbaugh re: ID theft — that’s if the “ID theft” is committed by the "vengeful exes” and he just hosts the info? -
@adamsteinbaugh Complaint is skimpy on deets, wondering if there’s more going on. -
@adamsteinbaugh But yes, Overt Acts 1-6 for Count 1 are like :((( wrt CDA 230. I don’t remember what the site looked like, but> -
@adamsteinbaugh I’m trying to mentally separate out a distinction between his actions covered by cda safe harbor (publication, hosting)> -
@adamsteinbaugh & intentional acts outside just being a site operator that would go towards ID theft charge. - 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.