Ah, so if U.S. government says Bitcoin is legitimate, it suddenly has extrinsic force: it will be accepted like “real” money.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@GlennF Bitcoin isn't used as a unit of account, it's used as a medium of value. Best understood as a payment system.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@GlennF If the US "recognizes" Bitcoin, it's not as money per se but as an alternative / marginal practice of payments.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong I do see your point. But it also sweeps it closer to extrinsic.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@GlennF >they are the only ones that apply that kind of game-changing action to money.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Also agree. Something about having nuclear weapons helps, though.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @GlennF
@GlennF shameless self-promotion: I wrote this from a quasi-sovereign theory of money POV http://ssrn.com/abstract=2294124 …2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Oh, this looks wonderful. I am marking to read later (and I will). I have an Economist piece coming out in a couple of weeks1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.