weak hypo imo
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong seems like fair use as commentary is a better argument, but it's still too unclear what the commentary is.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @copiesofcopies
@copiesofcopies Somewhere between "this photojournalism is boring" and "have you tried just walking thru, even the google car's been there"1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong maybe fact-checking? "Yep, fresh deli sandwiches are really $3.85."1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @copiesofcopies
@copiesofcopies I laughed, but yes, why not fact-checking / location confirming / etc.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong there's an argument there, but I'd like it better if there was more to the post than just the images.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @copiesofcopies
@copiesofcopies well, supposedly it's forthcoming? Author said it was meant to provoke thought and he wanted to think more before writing.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@copiesofcopies Is it relevant that the photographs were all taken without the permission of the people being photographed?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @zunguzungu
.
@zunguzungu@copiesofcopies I don't think that would affect copyright. Maybe someone else can weigh in on that though.3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@copiesofcopies As far as I'm concerned, it's fair use: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107 …1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@zunguzungu @copiesofcopies I think we're both inclined to agree with you, but it doesn't fit easily into the best-known precedents
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.