@sarahjeong Out of curiosity: Why don't revenge porn victims go after sites based on record-keeping provisions in 18 USC 2257?
@adamsteinbaugh @maassive It looks like Randazza filed a civil case citing 2257 tho: http://newswire.xbiz.com/view.php?id=163381 … @ncardozo
-
-
@sarahjeong@maassive@ncardozo those cases, btw, are full of lulz. Randazza is shooting fish in a barrel. They're all pro se and flailing. -
@adamsteinbaugh@maassive@ncardozo Of course. Of course they're pro se. -
@sarahjeong@maassive@ncardozo and outsourcing their legal work to, IIRC, China. Seriously.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@maassive@ncardozo yup. It doesn't provide direct civil relief, but I suspect it provides an argument voiding CDA 230.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.