@sarahjeong Out of curiosity: Why don't revenge porn victims go after sites based on record-keeping provisions in 18 USC 2257?
-
@sarahjeong But, surely, there are some intrepid DAs and USAs out there who'd love the belt notches?
@maassive One would hope. Hoping that writing about it might set off some lightbulbs / lobbying
-
-
@sarahjeong Have you seen any legal pieces about revenge porn and 18 USC 2257? (Since INAL, I don't really follow the literature) -
@maassive Nope, the first I'd heard about the possibility was on TWITTER! So I looked into the statute and went "whoa" -
@sarahjeong From someone else, not me, right? -
-
@sarahjeong Oh, I just saw the 2257 part in your Wired piece.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong I mean, 18 USC 2257 violations have a 5-year sentence; that might be a deterrent. (Though not sure what EFF's position would be)Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong@maassive Again not really. The FBI didn't see the applicability of 2257 vs revenge porn. -
-
@sarahjeong@maassive I don't think they have the budget or manpower to go after revenge porn. Terrorism is priority #1.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.