@vogon so it means they're *seized,* right, not *gone*? You can't just vanish something from the blockchain?
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong vanish as in un-issue the currency, or vanish as in take from the owner permanently?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong they're gone from accounts the DCA controls, and depending on how Silk Road's holdings, maybe impossible to get back2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong yeah, you could theoretically buy stuff that wasn't illegal on SR (but why would you ever want to go to the trouble)1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong they say they were just innocuously buying legal things to look into the market, and *shrug* stranger things have happened1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong there was a CS paper this year (http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~smeiklejohn/files/imc13.pdf …) where the authors bought legal stuff from SR to deanonymize SR's account2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.