seems obvious, but make revenge porn a crime http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/09/24/revenge_porn_is_domestic_abuse_it_should_be_a_crime.html … dont punish those taking, but those improperly spreading the photos
-
@sarahjeong what adverse consequences are there for making spreading images without consent and with intent to harm being punishable?
1) criminal liability for a Reddit upvote? 2) for Reddit? 3) for imgur? 4) abuse of law by Prenda, Perfect 10?@nathanjurgenson
-
-
And the intent bit doesn't actually solve those problems. "Intent to harm" is going to depend on how harm is defined.
@nathanjurgenson -
Harm is likely going to HAVE to be defined in terms of publicity-- e.g., intent to share publicly.
@nathanjurgenson -
One of Perfect 10's arguments against Google was that Google was harming the women whose photos were taken.
@nathanjurgenson -
@sarahjeong v important details, but ones that exist outside digital images that the law has dealt w/. welcome that same debate here -
My point in bringing up Perfect 10 is that "harm to women" is coopted to pursue frivolous litigation for personal gain
@nathanjurgenson -
@sarahjeong i see, though doesn't seem to preclude creating a framework that punishes people who spread images non-consensually -
It's *exactly* what copyright law does (tho base motivation is diff.) and there's a reason why services have safe harbor.
@nathanjurgenson -
@sarahjeong is this argument against non-consensual image-sharing w/ intent to harm anywhere longform? having a hard time following in 140 - 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.