seems obvious, but make revenge porn a crime http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/09/24/revenge_porn_is_domestic_abuse_it_should_be_a_crime.html … dont punish those taking, but those improperly spreading the photos
No, it's not actually obvious. Who counts as "improperly spreading"? + First Am considerations. @nathanjurgenson
-
-
That basis would disembowel the CDA and have wide-reaching effects beyond just revenge porn.
@nathanjurgenson -
@sarahjeong what adverse consequences are there for making spreading images without consent and with intent to harm being punishable? -
1) criminal liability for a Reddit upvote? 2) for Reddit? 3) for imgur? 4) abuse of law by Prenda, Perfect 10?
@nathanjurgenson -
And the intent bit doesn't actually solve those problems. "Intent to harm" is going to depend on how harm is defined.
@nathanjurgenson -
Harm is likely going to HAVE to be defined in terms of publicity-- e.g., intent to share publicly.
@nathanjurgenson -
One of Perfect 10's arguments against Google was that Google was harming the women whose photos were taken.
@nathanjurgenson -
@sarahjeong v important details, but ones that exist outside digital images that the law has dealt w/. welcome that same debate here - 6 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.