Even with the appreciated caveats in @mathewi's recent piece, I am struck by the lack of acknowledgement that Pax's sexism is silencing.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong: I do appreciate that -- I'm just questioning how much the response to it does the same thing, but in a different way1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong: I totally agree -- it is a very difficult problem, which is why I wanted to write about it, even though I find him pathetic2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @mathewi
@mathewi@sarahjeong I'm working through my thoughts on Pax & free/protected speech. Suggested reading?3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ElissaBeth
@ElissaBeth@mathewi I'm drawing my thoughts from First Am law, if I see anything shorter than a casebook I'll tweet at you.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@mathewi I have political theory background & file legal docs for fun. That's@hoffmang's influence. So a casebook would rock ;)2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@ElissaBeth @mathewi doctrinal keywords: fighting words, heckler's veto, hate speech, R.A.V. v. St. Paul, Virginia v. Black
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@mathewi Thank you - that's a good start.0 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.