Guess it's better than lexis-nexis, which is selling for $15 an article that is freely available in multiple places http://goo.gl/VtK4Au
-
@wbm312 I was wondering the same. Need to look for my contract.
@yanatweets @wbm312 Standard form is a license. JOLT has its own contract form though. But I have no reason to suspect it's different here.
-
-
@sarahjeong@wbm312 Yeah, I seem to recall that it was a license.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@yanatweets@wbm312 source: I send out the author contracts for my journal. -
@sarahjeong@yanatweets JOLT is part of the Open Access Law Program- so I'm guessing a license. http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/ See bottom. -
@wbm312@sarahjeong My guess is that lexis-nexis is out of line. JOLT has probably only given them the right to reprint, which they can do.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@yanatweets I just changed Illinois' to a license, authors were signing a form that signed over all rights to the trustees-yuck! -
@wbm312@yanatweets Gross. I didn't know that happened. -
@sarahjeong@yanatweets I found this article interesting: Copyright Provisions in Law Journal Publication Agreements http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=libpubs … -
@wbm312@sarahjeong Nice! Thank you!
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.