The ultimate point here was best articulated by @sarahjeong: Silicon Valley doesn't seem to agree/can't articulate that surveillance is bad.
-
@Dymaxion@jilliancyork@sarahjeong Nacchio refused to hand over data. I'm arguing tech companies can stop collecting messaging information
-
-
@sarahjeong@Dymaxion@jilliancyork Absolutely right in the case of metadata. But in this context I'm talking about content interception -
@riskybusiness@sarahjeong@jilliancyork How does google make money from gmail without content? -
@Dymaxion@sarahjeong@jilliancyork I wasn't talking about gmail. I took one example of mobile messaging. -
@riskybusiness@sarahjeong@jilliancyork messaging traffic is content-monetized. It's the default strategy for all hosted services. -
@Dymaxion@sarahjeong@jilliancyork That is incorrect. iMessage protocol is encrypted end-to-end. Can intercept by messing with keying -
@riskybusiness@sarahjeong@jilliancyork Which is why I was specifying *everything else in the messaging space*./ -
@Dymaxion@sarahjeong@jilliancyork Sure, but I argue about A and your counter argument is about B and C. -
@riskybusiness@sarahjeong@jilliancyork So there's one product that might in some situations not have a direct counterincentive. - 10 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.