@binarybits & the point that's been abandoned, but is still important: obliterating the distinction = slap in the face of trans community
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong The conceptual distinction is important! But that's a separate question from what the word "gender" means.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @binarybits
@binarybits No, it's not. Language is often shaped by "specialists" and "experts" because otherwise we lose conceptual distinctions.3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong If not we can't "lose" something we never had.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @binarybits
@binarybits That's getting semantic. And has anyone agreed with you that this is a "rarified" distinction?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong I think ~270 million people agree with me, but I haven't done a poll on the subject. :-)1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @binarybits
@binarybits I'm sure the incredible irony has occurred to you: you're the lone Twitter holdout claiming the rest of us comprise small group.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong People who follow the two of us on Twitter are not a random sample of the population!1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @binarybits
@binarybits Certainly not. But you still only have speculation to back your assumption that it's a "rarified" distinction.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Again, it's a matter of practical experience. Not something we can resolve over Twitter.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.