@binarybits @mollyknefel It's not just the preferences of affected community. It's also people who think critically about it ("experts").
-
@sarahjeong If not we can't "lose" something we never had.
@binarybits That's getting semantic. And has anyone agreed with you that this is a "rarified" distinction?
-
-
@sarahjeong I think ~270 million people agree with me, but I haven't done a poll on the subject. :-) -
@binarybits I'm sure the incredible irony has occurred to you: you're the lone Twitter holdout claiming the rest of us comprise small group. -
@sarahjeong People who follow the two of us on Twitter are not a random sample of the population! -
@binarybits Certainly not. But you still only have speculation to back your assumption that it's a "rarified" distinction. -
@sarahjeong Again, it's a matter of practical experience. Not something we can resolve over Twitter. -
@binarybits But as a friendly note, I'd like to say that your use of the word "arrogant" to@onekade earlier on was off-base. -
@binarybits Insisting on the correctness of conceptually important distinctions upon which your existential identity rests is not arrogance. -
@sarahjeong Yes, but insisting that everyone use your idiosyncratic vocabulary to describe it is.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.