sarah jeong

@sarahjeong @profcritic I honestly don't know all the details. The spending amount they're talking about is in the agenda for this week.

@cfarivar @profcritic Yeah, what McElhany is saying seems correct. This is just a really weird item.

@sarahjeong @cfarivar This helped a bit: http://stopgoldmansachs.blogspot.com/p/oaklands-goldman-sachs-rate-swap.html …

@ProfCritic @cfarivar Yeah. But still doesn't explain huge expenditure in agenda on "investigating"

@sarahjeong @cfarivar Yes, definitely does not!

@ProfCritic @sarahjeong I honestly don't know what "disbarrment" means in this context. That Oakland won't deal with Goldman anymore?

@cfarivar @ProfCritic Debarment. And that's what it looks like. Like divestment, but the other way around.

@sarahjeong Ok, debarrment. Can't that just be done without spending $250k? Like just say Goldman has cooties or whatever? #oakmtg