Wait, proceedings against Goldman Sachs? I want to hear more about this #oakmtg
-
@cfarivar Thank you! So the investigator is to try and get money back from losses?
@ProfCritic @cfarivar It seems like a weirdly huge amount of money to spend on what the ebcitzen article is talking about.
-
-
@sarahjeong@profcritic I honestly don't know all the details. The spending amount they're talking about is in the agenda for this week. -
@cfarivar@profcritic Yeah, what McElhany is saying seems correct. This is just a really weird item. -
@ProfCritic@cfarivar Yeah. But still doesn't explain huge expenditure in agenda on "investigating" -
@sarahjeong@cfarivar Yes, definitely does not! -
@ProfCritic@sarahjeong I honestly don't know what "disbarrment" means in this context. That Oakland won't deal with Goldman anymore? -
@cfarivar@ProfCritic Debarment. And that's what it looks like. Like divestment, but the other way around. -
@sarahjeong Ok, debarrment. Can't that just be done without spending $250k? Like just say Goldman has cooties or whatever?#oakmtg - 4 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.