Respectfully, I think you are not addressing the point the tweeter was making, which as I understand it refers to the long (and horrifying) infrastructure in place for smuggling people up to the US border, but something unrelated (whether immigrants do crime once in the US)
-
-
if what he's saying is even further afield from that, this seems to be his problem since he would now not even be in the ballpark of this entire issue
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
No, Pinboard was correct about what my point was. But you just did a good job admitting that the goal is not protecting the children, but instead is amnesty for those who break the law by entering the country illegally.
-
Easily solved by decriminalizing crossing the border.
-
Alternatively: Cross the border legally, at a designated point of entry. No one wants to stop immigration. They just want it to be documented so that we can properly take care of our immigrants and fellow citizens.
-
Asylum seekers are being physically prevented from doing this by the Border Patrol.https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/6/5/17428640/border-families-asylum-illegal …
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I also oppose mass detention, but I believe there is substance to the argument that de facto amnesty to anyone arriving with a kid and requesting asylum would have some harrowing consequences south of the border.
-
are you inferring trafficking?
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.