Thank you
-
-
A Pattern Language is the most popular; most likely that somebody else at a cocktail party will have read it. Breezy read despite being 1100 pages. NotSoF is an adaptation of his PhD thesis; <300 pages but a lot of math. Also the oldest, and least magisterial tone.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
best way to read pattern language is to just start reading patterns at total random
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @sarahdoingthing @doriantaylor i sljedećem broju korisnika:
I'm not sure. Although I did pick a few here and there initially, you miss the whole hierarchy if reading at random, imo.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @SimRodier @sarahdoingthing i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Thank you, everyone! I'll start with APL. My intuition is it'll become a bible for me. Dorian, loved yr "Toward a Theory of Design as Computation" article, esp "I'm fed up with working in an ecosystem that selects for garbage…"
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @callumflack @SimRodier i sljedećem broju korisnika:
indeed, processes in which the whole artifact passes through several intermediate states—in which the current state in informed by the previous state and informs the following state—are pretty poorly understood in "the west"
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @doriantaylor @callumflack i sljedećem broju korisnika:
like we have concepts like "iteration" and "incrementalism" (which are distinct from one another) that *some* people understand but their bosses likely don't
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @doriantaylor @callumflack i sljedećem broju korisnika:
(moreover neither of those concepts are really as sophisticated as, say, embryogenesis)
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @doriantaylor @callumflack i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Iteration needed to lead to sophistication such as embryogenesis...?
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @SimRodier @callumflack i sljedećem broju korisnika:
"iteration" may or may not use the existing configuration to inform the next; "incrementalism" only attaches itself to some corner of the existing configuration (cf http://alistair.cockburn.us/Incremental+versus+iterative+development …)
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
do you mean something like this?pic.twitter.com/TBHzo1AgzJ
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @sarahdoingthing @SimRodier i sljedećem broju korisnika:
you ever see the suspiciously CES-looking edition of On Growth and Form? https://archive.org/details/ongrowthform1917thom …pic.twitter.com/TuUpcPH3Eu
0 replies 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.