I'd like to hear @sarahdoingthing and @KevinSimler discuss http://m.nautil.us/issue/47/consciousness/the-kekul-problem …
-
-
Replying to @vgr @sarahdoingthing
it may simply be too late but i got nothing out of that article :(
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @vgr
it made me angry but I think that's because I wasted so much time on rene girard
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing @vgr
Girard is a waste? I've had him on my to-read list for ages....
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
so have I, it has created a huge mess in my head so far, not sure it's a good idea
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing @KevinSimler
you see people doing stuff like this https://msu.edu/course/eng/483/snapshot.afs/johnsen/garrells.pdf … - but girard was a literary scholar...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing @KevinSimler
and his theory is profoundly literary/narrative, in that it displays excellent fit between its parts and has nice examples...
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
but it doesn't fit well with scientific modes of thinking (or with non-literary reality I think)
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing @KevinSimler
The mess is that he said wrongly that Scriptures & his theory are the same thing. Otherwise MT is scientific.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.