@sarahdoingthing I would agree (& it's the key reason I've been meaning to reply on Simmler's otherwise elegant theory/post, too elegant...)
-
-
Replying to @AlexSchleber
@sarahdoingthing I think this is where the 2 subthreads reconverge: There are more dimensions (= archetypes / roles) in play.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AlexSchleber
@AlexSchleber it's a rather sweet dimension though - nuance follows abstraction1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing it *feels* sweet/elegant, but I see a lot of problems, starting w/ fact that Hero needs more motivation than remote payoff2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlexSchleber
@sarahdoingthing ..to overcome v. real fear of death say right then. I'd posit a "Hero instinct", which btw others can also experience..2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing "eager to celebrate heroes. It just feels right and natural..tell-tale sign of self-interest" - far too weak for my taste1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AlexSchleber
@sarahdoingthing his version of more Econ 101/Smithian "self interest" is a bolt-on vs.other, much older types of "Selfish Gene" programming1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlexSchleber
@AlexSchleber a damned old one though, like behaviorally modern humans old2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing not sure; IMO, if it can't be explained at Hunter-Gatherer "pack" level, it's probably not explained yet.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@AlexSchleber would love to hear what you come up with!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.