The lion's share of the blame for the Oregon thing seems to lie with whoever wrote the state's water rights overhaul in the early 20th C.
-
-
Replying to @blue_traveler
Mandating possession of a water right for any usage when that right doesn't imply an easement may be legally sound, but it's unintuitive
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @blue_traveler
…Extremely unintuitive for the expected citizen*
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @blue_traveler
@blue_traveler social consequences of legal unintuitiveness is an interesting cross-cultural research topic2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@blue_traveler vagueness and unintuitiveness are features not bugs from some stakeholders' perspectives3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@blue_traveler or not even stakeholders just a purely procedural ease-of-getting-passed perspective1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing how so? Not sure I understand1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@blue_traveler a vague law or one that's hard to understand will have fewer parties opposing it in democratic deliberations
-
-
-
Replying to @blue_traveler
@sarahdoingthing EXTROVERT LAWS, INTROVERT LAWS0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.