You need models (compression progress) for observations to be surprising - pure randomness isn't surprising or interesting or beautiful
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing maybe you'd be interested: calibrating schema as john henry holland's adaptive system as entropic self organization1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sulphuroxide
@sarahdoingthing a difference: this can break free of domain constraints; define new logics. compression can only measure aesthetics? maybe?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sulphuroxide
@sulpuroxide the hardware architecture of meat brains as opposed to more intuitive calculating systems might limit what you can do
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing why humans can be surprisingly more unpredictable than simpler machines. skolem's paradox lets us make surprise moves1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sulphuroxide
@sarahdoingthing Google's GO machine they call as AI but it's not; true AI gets to choose to choose. metachoice = the ability to get bored1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sulphuroxide
@sarahdoingthing computers can do specific tasks better, but having unpredictable complexity will make computers as unfocused as us meat bag1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sulphuroxide
@sarahdoingthing in a way, isaac asimov's robot laws refer desire back to human desire; the one organizational principle that is truly us1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sulphuroxide
@sarahdoingthing i bet the next step regardless of material will be the trajectory of our consciousness into quasi-non organic materials1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sulphuroxide
@sarahdoingthing increased processing will even physically intrude on our brains but desire is the calibrating focus for agency2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@sulpuroxide I'm sure it already has
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing the one thing we should beware of is teleology for it is for-itself in-itself without basis1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sulphuroxide
@sarahdoingthing i like this article, but suspicious; immanent epistemes could be an artifact of storage structure not nec of causal trace2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.