Housing under Capitalism Read: http://tl.gd/n_1so5u9h
-
-
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings This seems to assume a price-setting cartel of landowners.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DoTheWeirdStuff
@willdoingthings Changing regulations & other universal rules could actually change some effects.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DoTheWeirdStuff
@DoTheWeirdStuff right you need to limit people to owning only houses that they themselves occupy—basically broadening squatter's rights1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings@DoTheWeirdStuff incidentally california has the shortest adverse possession term in the country, only 5 years1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@willdoingthings@DoTheWeirdStuff I had wondered why every article I've read about hipster squatters took place in CA1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @blue_traveler
@blue_traveler@willdoingthings@DoTheWeirdStuff why have I never put this secret legal knowledge to use sigh1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing does what qualify as contesting a claim to possession also vary state by state, or is that national? 5 yrs still long time2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blue_traveler
@sarahdoingthing iirc it's extremely easy to prevent adverse possession1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@blue_traveler correct, one hilarious option is to actually notice it and send a letter permitting the use until your lawyer can fix it
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@blue_traveler "I see you um it's ok" instant fail1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Right I remember that. Granting an explicit easement basically defeats it1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.