Skimmed the paper. It's as disingenuous as the NYT article, for once: they're really saying a 3% price change led to a 24% drop in gonorrhea
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
Oddly enough JUST gonorrhea. Chlamydia was unchanged. Well, never mind that. Also LITERALLY NO OTHER FACTORS might have affected infections.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
Full text, if you haven't reached your Christmas Eve eye-rolling quota. http://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797%2815%2900627-3/fulltext …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev if you squint really hard and suspend that nasty critical thinking habit you can see a trendpic.twitter.com/fQveAooFcI
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing I'm embarassed for the authors. I'm angry at NYT for being so terrible.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@sarahdoingthing Warm, hazy dreamworld of The Narrative: any state intervention must be causative of any good outcome. Nothing else is real!3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.