Maybe we should start arguing that encryption IS a weapon, so it's covered under the 2A.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing no 2A protection because as in United States v. Miller there is no intention in the 2a to allow public access.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides @St_Rev self-hating pedant lawyers only plspic.twitter.com/3YUhIaY95z
2:34 PM - 6 Dec 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.