@nydwracu @sarahdoingthing I dunno, ask a physicist
-
-
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin@nydwracu@sarahdoingthing You could quantify goodness as mutual information between creator's intent and perceiver's experience.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @othercriteria
@drethelin@nydwracu@sarahdoingthing To get high MI, you need high intended complexity, high fidelity, and high legibility.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @othercriteria
@drethelin@nydwracu@sarahdoingthing A McChicken might be saying something cleanly and perceptibly, but it's not saying very much.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @othercriteria
@othercriteria@drethelin@nydwracu goes to the work/leisure distinction (as fuzzy as goodness)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@drethelin@nydwracu Yeah? We'd care less about cuisine if we didn't have to eat, or had fewer eating-based rituals.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@othercriteria food is usually seen as leisure, but soylent suggests not only acquiring & preparing but even eating food can be work
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.