Hmm, article by @AdamMGrant on Gladwell refers to Murray Davis paper. That *is* v Interesting, no, @vgr @sarahdoingthing?
-
-
@sarahdoingthing@r_ganesh Interesting, yes. Explains 50% of Gladwell. The other 50, unfortunately, is pandering to flattering self images. -
@vgr@sarahdoingthing He has brought interesting concepts to popularity but glib tone at times + some brutal exposes on him
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sarahdoingthing@r_ganesh Also explains 50% of my hits. Other 50% for me is not pandering I hope. Consolation for 0.1% Gladwell success.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.