Does anyone here know how to construct a good personality typology system? MBTI is good but nowhere near what should be possible.
-
-
Replying to @FrameOfStack
@FrameOfStack there are some papers that say MBTI isn't good 'cuz correlation between factors. It's true but imo a weak/overstated complaint1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@FrameOfStack big 5 has moderately better statistical validity but it looks at different things. IMO less interesting things1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@FrameOfStack I think MBTI's T/F distinction is by far the most interesting personality psychology distinction I've seen1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings@FrameOfStack not N/S? Or N so obviously superior that it's not interesting1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@FrameOfStack N/S is interesting. it's super correlated with g, i'd like to see what a strongly S but high g person is like2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.