@GabrielDuquette (e.g large herbivore trails, some architecture)
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@GabrielDuquette What are you saying here beyond the pave-the-cowpaths principle of design?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing You mean the game theory question? Diff here is I actually think you have an answer here insteady of implying you don't!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
@sarahdoingthing Trying to get a sneak peek of whatever the ribbonfarm post this might turn into :D1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing ontological maps like 4 elements to cardinal directions AND games. predate maps in the archaeological record1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @thejaymo
@sarahdoingthing First map was undoubtedly the star chart. http://timothystephany.com/gobekli.html2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @thejaymo
@sarahdoingthing first you have to be able to 'contain' a complete reality before you can read a map.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @thejaymo
@sarahdoingthing ne1 can read own map they have drawn. but for u to be able to read mine, both our contained/projected realities must agree1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Maps like games are one of the easiest ritualistic tools for defining a shared 'complete reality'0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.