@Meaningness @St_Rev negotiating examples are the best, just including the theory sum-up that follows the tutoring example
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@St_Rev So is “anti-choice feminism” an actual thing I can read about somewhere?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness I *think*@St_Rev was characterizing this kind of thing http://theconversation.com/no-feminism-is-not-about-choice-40896 …3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@Meaningness Yes, tweet was reacting specifically to that article, but I've encountered the line of attack before.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing It’s easy to see that *some* (maybe even most) women would benefit by restricting some other women’s choices…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing It’s technically interesting to see whether they have an argument that *all* women could be so benefitted.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@St_Rev there's this ;) http://www.austin-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Cultural-Suppression-of-Female-Sexuality.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@St_Rev Yeah, that’s my analysis of what’s mostly going on here. My intro to evopsych was Cashdan’s early Dads-Cads paper,1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@sarahdoingthing@St_Rev As soon as I read that, everything in the universe suddenly made sense, and I derived the rest of evopsych from >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@sarahdoingthing@St_Rev > first principles while on a long hike through the bush surrounding Canberra.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@Meaningness @St_Rev wild places are incredibly useful for intuitively understanding evolution
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.