The point of anti-choice feminism seems pretty clear: if choices are of no value, taking them away is no harm. Obvious implications.
-
-
@St_Rev canonical example is the night cashier at a liquor storepic.twitter.com/uowADJ9XIR
-
@St_Rev being harmed by the option to open the safe, because having that option attracts robbers - similar logic to anti-slavery/organ sale - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@sarahdoingthing@St_Rev Another non-example. The harm is done by additional information conveyed with the choice, not by having new option.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.