Thinking about "persons" privileges a kind of rationality that is rare in reality, and invites us to elide the normal processes of peopling.
-
-
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@harrison_partch I'm really not, I'm definitely a person-agnostic or maybe even more extreme
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@harrison_partch well if you mean "infants or teenagers or adults or old people?" for instance, "peopling" covers the whole process better
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@harrison_partch I try to mean everything both as a joke and as serious so it's always helpful for people to take things either way
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@harrison_partch it's what I aspire to at least - I don't always live up to it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sarahdoingthing dangerous to what? -
@cwage to good ways of living, to thinking. too easy to store "persons" in human storage, harder to design for peopling.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@jonathanglick well http://carcinisation.com/2014/07/22/toward-the-synthesis-of-flourishy-forms/ … but I might take your invitation and tweetstorm more! - 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.