@sarahdoingthing If property is 'reasonable' expectation of control, you need a society with a judge to decide what's reasonable.
-
-
Replying to @Alrenous
@sarahdoingthing While it would be best for all interaction to be covered by contract, it's not feasible. Assumptions are made.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alrenous
@sarahdoingthing That said, I suggest treading lightly when not covered by contract, knowing in advance that arbitration is expensive.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alrenous
@sarahdoingthing And then there's children, who unavoidably enter into relationships with no contract.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Alrenous
@sarahdoingthing I suppose I should actually refer to the sensation of pain as hurt, which means utilitarianism is subsidiarily true.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alrenous
@sarahdoingthing That is, even with two who both wish not to hurt the other, sometimes hurt is unavoidable, but can always be minimized.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing I'm talking pain qualia. If there's no qualia you're not feeling it. All qualia are psychological.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Check: do I? Yes. If we didn't, we wouldn't be able to contract at all. We clearly can in fact go buy things.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Disagree. Contract 'well' is merely 'at all' + experience, and is sufficient to anchor it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alrenous
@sarahdoingthing Indeed a large part of the current problem is assuming 'well' isn't feasible and thus not getting experience.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.