but maybe i'm not sure "beauty is fit" has content either?
-
-
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
beauty is the successful solving of such subproblems as the thing would need to solve in order to be beautiful
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
if you replace "beautiful" with "effective" in that last sentence then it starts having content but maybe not before
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
and then it better not be like "effective at what?" "effective at being beautiful"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit (a) causing flourishing (b) elegantly encoding information ?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing hmm. is it really about effectiveness? hacks can be effective but ugly1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit I wonder if it's no more than a reminder that looking at "beauty" is looking at the outward-reaching parts of our brains1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@VesselOfSpirit including their capacity to appreciate elegant/simple encodings of complexity - brute effectiveness doesn't do this5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing i think probably things like fit and complexity are part of it and then part is about non-unifiable human reward buttons1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit you can't brute force beauty by optimizing for some reward button (pleasure, longing) but I think you can brute force beauty1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@VesselOfSpirit computationally if you had enough information about multiple reward buttons and how they connect
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.