-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing point 4 is pretty interesting2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blue_traveler
@blue_traveler YES writing til;dr's for glory and profit2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing I suppose a counterpoint is that it's easy to underestimate the value of synthesis when you already have it2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blue_traveler
@blue_traveler definitely - for me I have to catch something right as I'm first understanding it to have the energy to explain it1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@blue_traveler like right now it is torture to finish writing this one-chaptee tl;dr of old insights that finally form a tidy structure1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Know what you mean. Even leaving oneself sufficiently evocative notes and hooks, retreading old ground coherently' a drag.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blue_traveler
@blue_traveler and it's what you're ultra-qualified to tl;dr - maybe that's why we tend to get tl;dr's from people who aren't qualified...1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Recognition of exposition flows towards those getting the biggest kicks1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@blue_traveler yes! oh man this is the phenomenon that explains all those horrible books by journalists
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Now we just have to hack it and defeat it for the collective good.0 replies 1 retweet 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.