It clearly has harms and failure modes; is there a clear way to distinguish harmful nasty gossip from beneficial nasty gossip?
-
-
-
@sarahdoingthing 'harmful' and 'beneficial' take an indirect object: to whom? - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@GabrielDuquette so what builds versus destroys trust in this domain? charitable nasty gossip? nasty gossip at sufficient status remove? -
@sarahdoingthing@GabrielDuquette Nasty gossip over stuff that's happened publicly is less toxic than gossip where you share confidences. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@Ian_HT that's an interesting counter-process!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GabrielDuquette yeah, which could be rephrased as not triggering @Ian_HT 's counter-processThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Ian_HT excellent statement of the trade-off
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@StarryKari Interesting! Yes let's talk more about this when our mean conversations aren't captured for posterity hahaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sarahdoingthing Half of identity is deciding what you're not and rejecting it. Making fun of the other comes easily, early, and naturally. -
@laughinghyena13 yes! this is my theory of cleaning - that most cleaning humans do is not for hygiene but definition of self and non-self - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.