malthusian wringers of constant downward mobility, but don't worry they're optimized for eudaimonia
-
-
-
Replying to @HereticProg
@HereticProg (I was pattern-matching the phrase in your tweet, not exactly arguing with it - Dunbar stuff is super nice)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Still not sure if I'm following. My hunch is that small, close-knit communities are probably safer for women >>>1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HereticProg
@HereticProg I don't necessarily disagree re: safety, though I think it's a complicated comparison - I just have a hard time seeing...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@HereticProg how other features of the picture, like majority infant/child mortality, extreme downward social mobility, etc. can be eudaimon2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@HereticProg The conditions for orderly eugenic civilization seem kind of terrible when we're not being Little House on the Prairie about it1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing By eudæmonia, I mean "human flourishing" in the Aristotelean sense, not eugenics.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@HereticProg I know, I'm the one importing eugenics
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Gotcha. I'm going to take a long walk and noodle on this a little more.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.