@AnarchoPapist @ThiamineP women who no on is going to support for life and men who can't support a woman for life, lose here
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@AnarchoPapist @ThiamineP These categories have been small for the last 50 years. http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2010/usmarriagedecline.aspx …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfessorZaius
@ProfessorZaius Which categories do you mean?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Women no one is going to support for life and men who can't support a women for life. These categories were much higher>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfessorZaius
@sarahdoingthing in some regions in the past. Gregory Clark estimates that between 15-20% of English women between 1700-1900 never married.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfessorZaius
@ProfessorZaius so 15-20% never married then, 50% never married now?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Pretty much. So has the category of men who cannot support a woman increased that drastically compared to then?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfessorZaius
@ProfessorZaius I completely agree that not making more of a particular kind of victim is the best way to reduce harm to those victims1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ProfessorZaius (i.e., what England did with its suffering people)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.