Much political debate reduces to an unspoken disagreement about what people are for. For themselves? For each other? For God?
@cwage an idealized view of libertarians might be "people are for whatever they think they are for" - probably rarely realized as such
-
-
@sarahdoingthing e.g. technology as coercion-enabler = reason collectivism is inevitable -
@cwage I need to think more about this - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@sarahdoingthing this is why i struggle with my (probably overly) relative/nihilist "whatever's best for the species" angle -
@cwage oooh that's another good one! value at species level
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sarahdoingthing a lot of the circles i talk myself into can lead to justifying collectivism just as easilyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sarahdoingthing anyway tl;dr i don't argue politics much!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.