@cwage yeah any common sense limit you might think civil rights law has, it does not have.
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@cwage (because it runs on sacredness rather than what we usually think of as sense)3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing i look forward to this passing so the fed can ban it, and then the states can ban the ban on the ban1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@cwage in practice it's taking away freedoms from business owners, turning them ever more into serfs. restauranteurs not just in it for $.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@cwage how's it work in countries without nondiscrimination laws? I assume gay people can still buy cakes there?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin@cwage they might have to find a baker who is cool with it. I think any business owner should be able to say "no soup for you"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@drethelin@cwage for any and no reason. that would be real freedom.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@cwage "real freedom" is good why? not that I disagree but let's not use applause lights3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin@sarahdoingthing objectively speaking, one business's discrimination is another's business opportunity1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@cwage @drethelin exactly - don't want to serve X group? somebody probably does, let them!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.