Careful precedent selection: the first "disparate impact" case (Griggs) actually involved what was clearly intentional discrimination.
@admittedlyhuman seems devious to turn a policy DESIGNED to exclude blacks from good jobs into poster defendant of this new cause of action.
-
-
@sarahdoingthing isn't the point ostensibly to root out policies that are designed to exclude blacks but you can't prove it? -
@admittedlyhuman that's the intended (devious) subtext, but then in a few years you get female prison guards challenging height limits
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.