(The company policy at issue "just happened" to go into effect the exact same day the Civil Rights Act protections went into effect.)
-
-
-
Implied: "We know that when disparate impact occurs, it's really covering for intentional discrimination."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sarahdoingthing easy cases make bad law? -
@admittedlyhuman yes, but it seems actually devious (maybe just because I personally bought it for this reason for so long) - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@sarahdoingthing isn't the implication of disparate impact that it's all secretly discrimination?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.