Since being able to truncate one's well-being function appears to be such a clear win, does it do some kind of hidden (2nd order?) damage?
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
Basically if everyone had a strictly positive utility function truncated at 0, are there reasons to think everyone wouldn't be better off?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AvengingRedHand
@AvengingRedHand The idea here is that we each measure our own utility, as in revealed preference. Just need to compare it to 0.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@AvengingRedHand I am wondering, do we all get some huge benefit from each of us being able to bind ourselves to involuntarily suffer?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AvengingRedHand
@AvengingRedHand We do this in lots of practical ways - taking on responsibilities, getting a law degree, joining a street gang...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AvengingRedHand
@AvengingRedHand I think we are already bound (by being born into human bodies) to do this frequently.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@AvengingRedHand Not at all - but there are many barriers, biological-evolved and cultural-legal-technological, that make suicide hard/fail
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.