@sarahdoingthing it seems like it's really hard to have one norm for the smart people and another for the dum-dum, for signaling reasons
-
-
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@sarahdoingthing "you want to go steady? what, are you calling me *stupid*?!?"1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@admittedlyhuman I think Christians call this something about the weaker brother?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@admittedlyhuman like not drinking because even though alcohol might not cause you to sin, it will cause others to so it's a bad example2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@admittedlyhuman I kind of feel the opposite about alcohol.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin You mean wanting to proselytize about it, like I feel about cigarettes?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing that its fine for the people who are already dumb but smart people should be better at lowering inhibition consciously.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin I would prefer that dumb people keep their inhibitions1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@drethelin they can have alcohol if they're willing to wear a shock collar1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing it's too bad prohibition never works3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@drethelin shock collars are not prohibition they are a tax
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing technically everything is a tax on getting caught0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.