Does anyone have the link to the Australian study that showed men think domestic violence is women not having dinner ready on time?
-
Show this thread
-
2 replies 3 retweets 4 likesShow this thread
-
Replying to @purpleproze
@sarahdoingthing wrote a brilliant analysis of the argument for parity, mainly focusing on limitations in the CTS. I think it's a complex issue, but her critique resonates with my EvoPsych "priors." Worth reading!: https://web.archive.org/web/20130113175741/http://theviewfromhell.blogspot.com/2010/08/demonic-males-and-attack-heifers-on-sex.html …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NineBandedBooks @sarahdoingthing
Unarchived link, unfortunately. I’m a little wary of evo psych; I think it tends to work backward to find support for our existing prejudices. However, I’m open to learning because I honestly don’t mind new evidence changing my mind. (No one should mind, yet here we are.)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @purpleproze @sarahdoingthing
Hmm. Maybe search for: "Demonic Males and Attack Heifers: On the Sex Ratio of Marital Violence"
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NineBandedBooks @purpleproze1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
to this day every time I see something claiming gender parity, they’re using CTS-like methodology!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing @NineBandedBooks
I’m not very familiar with the CTS. My immediate question was whether it measures *defensive* blows.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @purpleproze @NineBandedBooks
CTS doesn’t distinguish context - if I playfully kick my husband in bed it’s “severe violence”
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing @NineBandedBooks
That’s... utterly ridiculous and prima facie useless. How is that passing academic rigor at all?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.